Messages in this thread | | | From | Janusz Krzysztofik <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: ams-delta: Drop board specific partition info | Date | Sun, 24 Mar 2019 21:30:28 +0100 |
| |
Hi,
On Sunday, March 24, 2019 7:59:32 PM CET Aaro Koskinen wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 05:48:22PM +0100, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote: > > Hi Aaro, > > > > Thanks for your review. > > > > On Wednesday, March 20, 2019 2:16:30 AM CET Aaro Koskinen wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 11:37:18PM +0100, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote: > > > > After recent modifications, only a hardcoded partition info makes > > > > the driver device specific. Other than that, the driver uses GPIO > > > > exclusively and can be used on any hardware. > > > > > > > > Drop the partition info and use MTD partition parser with default > > > > list of partition types instead. > > > > > > > > Amstrad Delta users should append the followig partition info to their > > > ^^^^^^^^ > > > Should be "following". > > > > > > > kernel command line, possibly by embedding it in CONFIG_CMDLINE: > > > > mtdparts=ams-delta-nand:3584k(Kernel),256k(u-boot),256k(u- boot_params),\ > > > > 256k(Amstrad_LDR),27m(File_system),768k(PBL_reserved). For their > > > > convenience, select CONFIG_MTD_CMDLINE_PARTS symbol from that board > > > > Kconfig automatically if this NAND driver is also selected. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@gmail.com> > > > > Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> > > > > > > Could we move the fixed partition setup to the board file > > > instead? Otherwise this kind of change is not really nice for the users, > > > as it will likely break existing setups. The default partition layout > > > should remain the same. > > > > I'm wondering if it would be acceptable to pass partition info from a .dts > > file. I think that would be a better, more modern approach than adding a new > > header under include/linux/platform_data. > > Hmm, I thought there was some generic way to define partitions without > adding any new headers. But if that is not possible, then I guess your > CMDLINE proposal is the preferred one..
I could for example reuse (or abuse) struct gpio_nand_platdata defined in include/linux/mtd/nand-gpio.h for use with drivers/mtd/nand/raw/gpio.c, but I'm not sure if hi-jacking a header that belongs to another driver would be an elegant solution.
Thanks, Janusz
> > A. >
| |