lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] memstick: fix a potential NULL pointer dereference
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 5:08 AM Kangjie Lu <kjlu@umn.edu> wrote:
>
> Hi Maxim,
>
> Can you review this patch?
>
> Thanks,
>
> > On Mar 9, 2019, at 1:59 AM, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@umn.edu> wrote:
> >
> > In case alloc_ordered_workqueue fails, the fix returns ENOMEM to
> > avoid potential NULL pointer dereference.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@umn.edu>
> > ---
> > drivers/memstick/core/ms_block.c | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/memstick/core/ms_block.c b/drivers/memstick/core/ms_block.c
> > index 82daccc9ea62..8e00de414567 100644
> > --- a/drivers/memstick/core/ms_block.c
> > +++ b/drivers/memstick/core/ms_block.c
> > @@ -2149,6 +2149,11 @@ static int msb_init_disk(struct memstick_dev *card)
> >
> > msb->usage_count = 1;
> > msb->io_queue = alloc_ordered_workqueue("ms_block", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM);
> > + if (!msb->io_queue) {
> > + rc = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto out_put_disk;
> > + }
> > +
> > INIT_WORK(&msb->io_work, msb_io_work);
> > sg_init_table(msb->prealloc_sg, MS_BLOCK_MAX_SEGS+1);
> >
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >

Looks OK to me!

Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>

Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-03-23 08:58    [W:0.046 / U:25.728 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site