[lkml]   [2019]   [Mar]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/6] sysctl: add pending proc_do_large_bitmap fix

On 3/21/19 12:13 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 3/20/19 5:28 PM, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
>> Andrew, Kees,
>> Eric sent a fix out for proc_do_large_bitmap() last month for when
>> using a large input buffer. After patch review a test case for the issue
>> was built and submitted. I noticed there were a few issues with the
>> tests, but instead of just asking Eric to address them I've taken
>> care of them and ammended the commit where necessary. There's a
>> few issues he reported which I also address and fix in this series.
>> Since we *do* expect users of these scripts to also use them on older
>> kernels, I've also addressed not breaking calling the script for them,
>> and gives us an easy way to easily extend our tests cases for future
>> kernels as well.
>> Before anyone considers these for stable as minor fixes, I'd recommend
>> we also address the discrepancy on the read side of things: modify the
>> test script to use diff against the target file instead of using the
>> temp file.
>> Eric Sandeen (2):
>> test_sysctl: add proc_do_large_bitmap() test case
>> sysctl: Fix proc_do_large_bitmap for large input buffers
> Isn't this missing:
> [PATCH] sysctl: add proc_do_large_bitmap test node

Oh, I see, you rolled it into the test patch. that wasn't clear...

 \ /
  Last update: 2019-03-21 20:18    [W:0.111 / U:0.616 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site