Messages in this thread | | | From | Daniel Colascione <> | Date | Wed, 20 Mar 2019 13:14:01 -0700 | Subject | Re: pidfd design |
| |
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 1:07 PM Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> wrote: > > What would be your opinion to having a > > /proc/<pid>/handle > > file instead of having a dirfd. > > This is even worse than depending on PROC_FS. Just for the dependency > pidfd code should be backed out immediately. Forget about /proc.
We already have pidfds, and we've had them since /proc was added ages ago. Backing out procfs is a bold proposal.
| |