lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Mar]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/5] ocxl: Remove some unused exported symbols
From
Date
On Wed, 2019-03-13 at 10:10 +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 15:07:01 +1100
> "Alastair D'Silva" <alastair@au1.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@d-silva.org>
> >
> > Remove some unused exported symbols.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@d-silva.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c | 2 --
> > drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/misc/ocxl.h | 23 -----------------------
> > 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c
> > b/drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c
> > index 026ac2ac4f9c..c90c2e4875bf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c
> > @@ -299,7 +299,6 @@ int ocxl_config_check_afu_index(struct pci_dev
> > *dev,
> > }
> > return 1;
> > }
> > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ocxl_config_check_afu_index);
> >
> > static int read_afu_name(struct pci_dev *dev, struct
> > ocxl_fn_config *fn,
> > struct ocxl_afu_config *afu)
> > @@ -535,7 +534,6 @@ int ocxl_config_get_pasid_info(struct pci_dev
> > *dev, int *count)
> > {
> > return pnv_ocxl_get_pasid_count(dev, count);
> > }
> > -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ocxl_config_get_pasid_info);
> >
> > void ocxl_config_set_afu_pasid(struct pci_dev *dev, int pos, int
> > pasid_base,
> > u32 pasid_count_log)
> > diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h
> > b/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h
> > index 321b29e77f45..06fd98c989c8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h
> > @@ -107,6 +107,29 @@ void ocxl_pasid_afu_free(struct ocxl_fn *fn,
> > u32 start, u32 size);
> > int ocxl_actag_afu_alloc(struct ocxl_fn *fn, u32 size);
> > void ocxl_actag_afu_free(struct ocxl_fn *fn, u32 start, u32 size);
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Get the max PASID value that can be used by the function
> > + */
> > +int ocxl_config_get_pasid_info(struct pci_dev *dev, int *count);
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Check if an AFU index is valid for the given function.
> > + *
> > + * AFU indexes can be sparse, so a driver should check all indexes
> > up
> > + * to the maximum found in the function description
> > + */
> > +int ocxl_config_check_afu_index(struct pci_dev *dev,
> > + struct ocxl_fn_config *fn, int
> > afu_idx);
> > +
> > +/**
>
> Two *s ?
>

These are Sphinx formatted comments (similar, but not quite the same as
Doxygen).

> Also, this results in an ocxl_internal.h header file where only these
> three functions are documented... which looks a bit weird IMHO. Since
> these are ocxl internals, do we _really_ need to keep the comments ?

I believe we should, it's a courtesy to the next person who has to work
in the area.

There are more documentation comments coming in further series.

--
Alastair D'Silva
Open Source Developer
Linux Technology Centre, IBM Australia
mob: 0423 762 819

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-03-14 03:23    [W:0.078 / U:46.520 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site