[lkml]   [2019]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC/PATCH 0/5] DVFS in the OPP core
On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 at 08:17, Viresh Kumar <> wrote:
> On 07-02-19, 14:37, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > I think we also need to consider cross SoC drivers. One SoC may have
> > both clocks and OPPs to manage, while another may have only clocks.
> We already have that case with CPUs as well and dev_pm_opp_set_rate()
> takes care of it.

I think you may have misunderstood my point. Or maybe I don't get yours. :-)

What if there is no OPP at all to use, then dev_pm_opp_set_rate() is
just a noop, right? In this scenario the driver still need to call

How do we cope with these cases?

> > Even it this may be fairly uncommon, we should consider it, before we
> > decide to fold in additional clock management, like
> > clk_prepare|unprepare() for example, behind the dev_pm_opp_set_rate()
> > API.
> >
> > The point is, the driver may need to call clk_prepare|enable()
> > anyways, unless we make that conditional depending on a DT compatible
> > string, for example. Of course, because the clock prepare/enable is
> > reference counted, there may not be a problem in practice to have both
> > the OPP and driver to deal with it.

Kind regards

 \ /
  Last update: 2019-02-08 10:46    [W:0.066 / U:3.188 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site