lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Feb]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC/PATCH 0/5] DVFS in the OPP core
From
Date

> 3) How do we handle devices that already have power-domains specified in
> DT? The opp binding for required-opps doesn't let us specify the power
> domain to target, instead it assumes that whatever power domain is
> attached to a device is the one that OPP needs to use to change the
> genpd performance state. Do we need a
> dev_pm_opp_set_required_opps_name() or something to be explicit about
> this? Can we have some way for the power domain that required-opps
> correspond to be expressed in the OPP tables themselves?

I was converting a few more drivers to use the proposed approach in this
RFC, in order to identify all outstanding issues we need to deal with,
and specifically for UFS, I end up with this exact scenario where UFS already
has an existing power domain (gdsc) and I need to add another one (rpmhpd) for
setting the performance state.

If I use dev_pm_opp_of_add_table() to add the opp table from DT, the opp
layer assumes its the same device on which it can do a dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state()
with, however the device that's actually associated with the pm_domain when we
have multiple power domains is infact the one (dummy) that we create when
the driver makes a call to dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name/id().

Any thoughts on whats a good way to handle this?

--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-02-07 07:58    [W:0.104 / U:11.420 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site