lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Skip LLC nohz logic for asymmetric systems
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 03:34:11PM +0000, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> The LLC nohz condition will become true as soon as >=2 CPUs in a
> single LLC domain are busy. On big.LITTLE systems, this translates to
> two or more CPUs of a "cluster" (big or LITTLE) being busy.
>
> Issuing a nohz kick in these conditions isn't desired for asymmetric
> systems, as if the busy CPUs can provide enough compute capacity to
> the running tasks, then we can leave the nohz CPUs in peace.
>
> Skip the LLC nohz condition for asymmetric systems, and rely on
> nr_running & capacity checks to trigger nohz kicks when the system
> actually needs them.
>
> Suggested-by: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 291dfdb0183f..ff27bf56e8d4 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -9545,6 +9545,17 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
> }
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> +
> + if (static_branch_unlikely(&sched_asym_cpucapacity))
> + /*
> + * For asymmetric systems, we do not want to nicely balance
> + * cache use, instead we want to embrace asymmetry and only
> + * ensure tasks have enough CPU capacity.
> + *
> + * Skip the LLC logic because it's not relevant in that case.
> + */
> + goto check_capacity;
> +
> sds = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu));
> if (sds) {
> /*

Since (before this) the actual order of the various tests doesn't
matter, it's a logical cascade of conditions for which to KICK_MASK.

We can easily reorder and short-circuit the cascase like so, no?

The only concern is if sd_llc_shared < sd_asym_capacity; in which case
we just lost a balance opportunity. Not sure how to best retain that
though.

--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -9568,25 +9568,6 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq
}

rcu_read_lock();
- sds = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu));
- if (sds) {
- /*
- * If there is an imbalance between LLC domains (IOW we could
- * increase the overall cache use), we need some less-loaded LLC
- * domain to pull some load. Likewise, we may need to spread
- * load within the current LLC domain (e.g. packed SMT cores but
- * other CPUs are idle). We can't really know from here how busy
- * the others are - so just get a nohz balance going if it looks
- * like this LLC domain has tasks we could move.
- */
- nr_busy = atomic_read(&sds->nr_busy_cpus);
- if (nr_busy > 1) {
- flags = NOHZ_KICK_MASK;
- goto unlock;
- }
-
- }
-
sd = rcu_dereference(rq->sd);
if (sd) {
/*
@@ -9600,6 +9581,20 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq
}
}

+ sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_asym_packing, cpu));
+ if (sd) {
+ /*
+ * When ASYM_PACKING; see if there's a more preferred CPU going
+ * idle; in which case, kick the ILB to move tasks around.
+ */
+ for_each_cpu_and(i, sched_domain_span(sd), nohz.idle_cpus_mask) {
+ if (sched_asym_prefer(i, cpu)) {
+ flags = NOHZ_KICK_MASK;
+ goto unlock;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_asym_cpucapacity, cpu));
if (sd) {
/*
@@ -9610,21 +9605,36 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq
flags = NOHZ_KICK_MASK;
goto unlock;
}
+
+ /*
+ * For asymmetric systems, we do not want to nicely balance
+ * cache use, instead we want to embrace asymmetry and only
+ * ensure tasks have enough CPU capacity.
+ *
+ * Skip the LLC logic because it's not relevant in that case.
+ */
+ goto unlock;
}

- sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_asym_packing, cpu));
- if (sd) {
+ sds = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu));
+ if (sds) {
/*
- * When ASYM_PACKING; see if there's a more preferred CPU going
- * idle; in which case, kick the ILB to move tasks around.
+ * If there is an imbalance between LLC domains (IOW we could
+ * increase the overall cache use), we need some less-loaded LLC
+ * domain to pull some load. Likewise, we may need to spread
+ * load within the current LLC domain (e.g. packed SMT cores but
+ * other CPUs are idle). We can't really know from here how busy
+ * the others are - so just get a nohz balance going if it looks
+ * like this LLC domain has tasks we could move.
*/
- for_each_cpu_and(i, sched_domain_span(sd), nohz.idle_cpus_mask) {
- if (sched_asym_prefer(i, cpu)) {
- flags = NOHZ_KICK_MASK;
- goto unlock;
- }
+ nr_busy = atomic_read(&sds->nr_busy_cpus);
+ if (nr_busy > 1) {
+ flags = NOHZ_KICK_MASK;
+ goto unlock;
}
+
}
+
unlock:
rcu_read_unlock();
out:
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-02-06 17:15    [W:0.109 / U:0.820 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site