lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Linux Kernel Regression: HAPS quirk breaks PCIe on i.MX6QP
Date
Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 08:38:58PM +0000, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
>> Hi Bjorn,
>>
>> Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 08:27:00PM +0000, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
>>>> Lukas Wunner wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:46:23PM +0000, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
>>>>>> @@ -629,6 +629,9 @@ static void quirk_synopsys_haps(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> u32 class = pdev->class;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> + if (class != PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_USB_XHCI)
>>>>>> + return;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> switch (pdev->device) {
>>>>>> case PCI_DEVICE_ID_SYNOPSYS_HAPSUSB3:
>>>>>> case PCI_DEVICE_ID_SYNOPSYS_HAPSUSB3_AXI:
>>>>> Please use DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_CLASS_HEADER() instead.
>>>> Sure. That's a better option. Can you test this with your setup?
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
>>>> index b0a413f3f7ca..f46e7de9e15d 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
>>>> @@ -639,8 +639,8 @@ static void quirk_synopsys_haps(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>>> break;
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>> -DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_SYNOPSYS, PCI_ANY_ID,
>>>> - quirk_synopsys_haps);
>>>> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_CLASS_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_SYNOPSYS, PCI_ANY_ID,
>>>> + PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_USB_XHCI, 0, quirk_synopsys_haps);
>>>>
>>>> /*
>>>> * Let's make the southbridge information explicit instead of having to
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Can we get a formal patch, including details about the issue (I assume
>>> Synopsys released two different parts with Device ID 0xabcd) and a
>>> signed-off-by?
>>>
>>> I'd like to get this into for-linus as soon as possible for v5.0.
>> I already submitted a patch for this. Please review patch subject
>> "[PATCH] PCI: Check for USB xHCI class for HAPS platform".
> OK, maybe I'm missing something. I don't see it on the linux-pci list
> [1] or the PCI patchwork [2] yet. Maybe it's still making its way
> through the mailing list servers. If you have a URL to the archive or
> patchwork, let me know.
>
> Bjorn
>
> [1] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lore.kernel.org_linux-2Dpci_&d=DwIBAg&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=u9FYoxKtyhjrGFcyixFYqTjw1ZX0VsG2d8FCmzkTY-w&m=gf8tJEWOt92UvWl-0yPhkFlhOXuG0fn-pG0zPdqsHv8&s=vQgsCLqN63Bd-d7ZMY5HPVmBa4Htnz64oO96cG-6pNA&e=
> [2] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__patchwork.ozlabs.org_project_linux-2Dpci_list&d=DwIBAg&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=u9FYoxKtyhjrGFcyixFYqTjw1ZX0VsG2d8FCmzkTY-w&m=gf8tJEWOt92UvWl-0yPhkFlhOXuG0fn-pG0zPdqsHv8&s=Tbm0SOa0CCxMxzGcwT6YJrYYzVEU6x7sR8JB9l82VGg&e=
>

That's odd. I sent it yesterday. I'll resend it then.

Thanks,
Thinh

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-02-05 22:03    [W:0.057 / U:2.776 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site