Messages in this thread | | | From | Souptick Joarder <> | Date | Tue, 5 Feb 2019 08:03:43 +0530 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] fs/dax: Convert to use vmf_error() |
| |
Hi Dan,
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 4:00 AM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 12:59 AM Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote: > > > > On Sat 05-01-19 00:54:11, Souptick Joarder wrote: > > > This code is converted to use vmf_error(). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com> > > > > Dan, you are merging DAX patches these days. So probably you should add > > yourself to 'FILESYSTEM DIRECT ACCESS (DAX)' in MAINTAINERs. > > Sounds good, I'll merge this and get MAINTAINERs fixed up.
This is not reflecting in linux-next. Is this queued for 5.1 ?
> > > Or I can start > > picking patches for fsdax to my tree if you are too busy but I think your > > tree is easier as there are less chances for conflicts etc. > > > > In either case this patch looks OK to me so feel free to add > > > > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> > > > > Honza > > > > > --- > > > fs/dax.c | 4 +--- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c > > > index 48132ec..ed39161 100644 > > > --- a/fs/dax.c > > > +++ b/fs/dax.c > > > @@ -1220,9 +1220,7 @@ static vm_fault_t dax_fault_return(int error) > > > { > > > if (error == 0) > > > return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE; > > > - if (error == -ENOMEM) > > > - return VM_FAULT_OOM; > > > - return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS; > > > + return vmf_error(error); > > > } > > > > > > /* > > > -- > > > 1.9.1 > > > > > -- > > Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> > > SUSE Labs, CR
| |