Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Sun, 03 Feb 2019 12:41:30 -0300 | From | Paul Cercueil <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] mtd: rawnand: jz4780-bch: Add support for the JZ4740 |
| |
Le dim. 3 févr. 2019 à 12:07, Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org> a écrit : > On Sun, 03 Feb 2019 11:56:32 -0300 > Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> wrote: > >> Le dim. 3 févr. 2019 à 11:16, Boris Brezillon >> <bbrezillon@kernel.org> >> a écrit : >> > On Sun, 03 Feb 2019 10:58:13 -0300 >> > Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> wrote: >> > >> >> Le dim. 3 févr. 2019 à 4:35, Boris Brezillon >> >> <bbrezillon@kernel.org> >> >> a écrit : >> >> > On Sat, 2 Feb 2019 20:19:26 -0300 >> >> > Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Add the backend code for the jz4780-bch driver to support >> the >> >> JZ4740 >> >> >> SoC from Ingenic. >> >> >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> >> >> >> --- >> >> >> >> >> >> Changes: >> >> >> >> >> >> v2: New patch >> >> >> >> >> >> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Makefile | 2 +- >> >> >> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/jz4740_bch.c | 173 >> >> >> ++++++++++++++++++ >> >> >> .../mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/jz4780_bch_common.c | 1 + >> >> >> .../nand/raw/ingenic/jz4780_bch_internal.h | 1 + >> >> >> 4 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> >> create mode 100644 >> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/jz4740_bch.c >> >> >> >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Makefile >> >> >> b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Makefile >> >> >> index f38b467490cf..d16c96113a93 100644 >> >> >> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Makefile >> >> >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/Makefile >> >> >> @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ >> >> >> obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_JZ4740) += jz4740_nand.o >> >> >> obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_JZ4780) += jz4780_nand.o >> >> jz4780_bch_common.o >> >> >> \ >> >> >> - jz4780_bch.o jz4725b_bch.o >> >> >> + jz4780_bch.o jz4725b_bch.o jz4740_bch.o >> >> > >> >> > I still don't see the point of the >> jz4780_bch_common/jz47xxx_bch >> >> > separation. You seem to always embed all objects anyway, so >> you >> >> can >> >> > just put the code for both engines in the same source file and >> >> decide >> >> > which one to use based on the compat (which you already do >> >> anyway). >> >> >> >> Each SoC has a different set of registers for the BCH hardware. >> I >> >> can >> >> try to >> >> cram everything into one file, but it won't be that much >> cleaner. >> > >> > Then maybe they deserve separate drivers/modules. >> > >> > BTW, didn't you say that one IP uses Reed-Salomon instead of BCH. >> I'd >> > suggest prefixing structs and functions with jz47xx_ecc instead of >> > jz47xx_bch and naming the common part jz47xx_ecc.c to reflect >> that. >> >> Would it be a good idea to make a generic ECC API that the >> jz47xx_nand >> driver could use? Then the three jz47xx BCH codepaths could be >> separate >> drivers that register with the generic ECC core. > > Definitely. Actually, Miquel is already working on that, but I don't > think it's a good idea to wait for this new framework to be finished > to > get your changes merged. So I'd recommend having a jz specific ECC API > (pretty much the one you have in the common file expect it would be > prefixed with _ecc instead of _bch) and convert it to the generic > approach afterwards. Given the size of the common.c file, you can even > put everything in jz47xx_ecc.h as inline funcs to avoid having yet > another module.
Ok, perfect, I'll do that. Thank you for your input!
| |