lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Feb]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] xhci: use iopoll for xhci_handshake
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 12:09 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 03:19:17PM -0700, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> > In cases such as xhci_abort_cmd_ring(), xhci_handshake() is called with
> > a spin lock held (and local interrupts disabled) with a huge 5 second
> > timeout. This can translates to 5 million calls to udelay(1). By its
> > very nature, udelay() is not meant to be precise, it only guarantees to
> > delay a minimum of 1 microsecond. Therefore the actual delay of
> > xhci_handshake() can be significantly longer. If the average udelay(1)
> > is greater than 2.2 us, the total time in xhci_handshake() - with
> > interrupts disabled can be > 11 seconds triggering the kernel's soft lockup
> > detector.
> >
> > To avoid this, let's replace the open coded io polling loop with one from
> > iopoll.h that uses a loop timed with the more presumably reliable ktime
> > infrastructure.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>
>
> Looks sane to me, nice fixup.
>
> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>
> Is this causing problems on older kernels/devices today such that we
> should backport this?

We detected that xhci_handshake timing out can lead to softlockup
while debugging a USB issue on a new product. The xhci_handshake
timeout itself is a symptom of another underlying problem causing some
commands to be aborted. I don't know if any such underlying problems
exist on other older devices, but the potential is there so a backport
is reasonable. Although, it may just shift the symptom of an
underlying problem from a softlockup/oops to some other symptom, like
USB just being dead.

-Dan

>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-02-28 17:51    [W:0.092 / U:0.404 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site