Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] Provide in-kernel headers for making it easy to extend the kernel | From | Dietmar Eggemann <> | Date | Thu, 28 Feb 2019 17:04:59 +0100 |
| |
Hi Joel,
On 2/28/19 3:47 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 01:53:43PM +0000, Qais Yousef wrote: >> Hi Joel >> >> On 02/27/19 14:37, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
[...]
> Ah good catch, I made this change for "file_list=${@:2}" in my tree but > forgot to push it. Below is the updated patch. Sorry and I'll refresh the > series with the change after we finish the discussion in the other thread. > Meanwhile the updated patch is as follows... > > ---8<----------------------- > > From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org> > Subject: [PATCH v3.1] Provide in-kernel headers for making it easy to extend the kernel > > Introduce in-kernel headers and other artifacts which are made available > as an archive through proc (/proc/kheaders.tar.xz file). This archive makes > it possible to build kernel modules, run eBPF programs, and other > tracing programs that need to extend the kernel for tracing purposes > without any dependency on the file system having headers and build > artifacts. > > On Android and embedded systems, it is common to switch kernels but not > have kernel headers available on the file system. Raw kernel headers > also cannot be copied into the filesystem like they can be on other > distros, due to licensing and other issues. There's no linux-headers > package on Android. Further once a different kernel is booted, any > headers stored on the file system will no longer be useful. By storing > the headers as a compressed archive within the kernel, we can avoid these > issues that have been a hindrance for a long time. > > The feature is also buildable as a module just in case the user desires > it not being part of the kernel image. This makes it possible to load > and unload the headers on demand. A tracing program, or a kernel module > builder can load the module, do its operations, and then unload the > module to save kernel memory. The total memory needed is 3.8MB. > > The code to read the headers is based on /proc/config.gz code and uses > the same technique to embed the headers.
This version gives me the header files on a v5.0-rc8 kernel on my arm64 box but does not compile anymore on v4.20:
kernel/kheaders.c:25:22: error: expected identifier or ‘(’ before string constant #define KH_MAGIC_END "IKHD_ED" ^ kernel/kheaders_data.h:1:1: note: in expansion of macro ‘KH_MAGIC_END’ KH_MAGIC_END; ^~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/kheaders.c: In function ‘ikheaders_read_current’: kernel/kheaders.c:38:12: error: ‘kernel_headers_data’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘kernel_headers_data_size’? kernel_headers_data + KH_MAGIC_SIZE, ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel_headers_data_size kernel/kheaders.c:38:12: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in kernel/kheaders.c: In function ‘ikheaders_init’: kernel/kheaders.c:31:10: error: ‘kernel_headers_data’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘kernel_headers_data_size’? (sizeof(kernel_headers_data) - 1 - KH_MAGIC_SIZE * 2) ^ kernel/kheaders.c:57:23: note: in expansion of macro ‘kernel_headers_data_size’ proc_set_size(entry, kernel_headers_data_size); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/kheaders.c: In function ‘ikheaders_read_current’: kernel/kheaders.c:40:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type] }
The reason for me to stay on v4.20 is that with v5.0-rc8 I don't have ebpf 'raw tracepoint' support any more on my arm64 board. But this issue is not related to your patch though.
Another point which supports the functionality your patch provides is the fact that maintainers don't want to see new TRACE_EVENTs in their code. So here your patch comes handy when using ebpf for tracing in embedded environments.
| |