lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH -next] habanalabs: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 9:04 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 05:46:01AM +0000, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> > A spin lock is taken here so we should use GFP_ATOMIC.
> >
> > Fixes: 0feaf86d4e69 ("habanalabs: add virtual memory and MMU modules")
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/misc/habanalabs/memory.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/misc/habanalabs/memory.c b/drivers/misc/habanalabs/memory.c
> > index 9236e52852c6..9e3491dc3b55 100644
> > --- a/drivers/misc/habanalabs/memory.c
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/habanalabs/memory.c
> > @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static int alloc_device_memory(struct hl_ctx *ctx, struct hl_mem_in *args,
> >
> > spin_lock(&vm->idr_lock);
> > handle = idr_alloc(&vm->phys_pg_pack_handles, phys_pg_pack, 1, 0,
> > - GFP_KERNEL);
> > + GFP_ATOMIC);
> > spin_unlock(&vm->idr_lock);
> >
> > if (handle < 0) {
> >
> >
> >
>
> Ah, nice catch!
>
> Oded, any objection to me taking this patch?
>
> greg k-h
No, of course not.
This patch is:
Reviewed-by: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@gmail.com>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-02-22 08:11    [W:0.085 / U:0.236 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site