[lkml]   [2019]   [Feb]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH RT 1/2] softirq: Avoid "local_softirq_pending" messages if ksoftirqd is blocked

On 18/02/19 17:31, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> If the ksoftirqd thread has a softirq pending and is blocked on the
> `local_softirq_locks' lock then softirq_check_pending_idle() won't
> complain because the "lock owner" will mask away this softirq from the
> mask of pending softirqs.
> If ksoftirqd has an additional softirq pending then it won't be masked
> out because we never look at ksoftirqd's mask.
> If there are still pending softirqs while going to idle check
> ksoftirqd's and ktimersfotd's mask before complaining about unhandled
> softirqs.
> Cc:
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <>

I've been seeing those messages while running some stress tests (hog
tasks pinned to CPUs).

Have yet to see them after I applied this patch earlier this morning (it
usually took not much time to reproduce).

Tested-by: Juri Lelli <>


- Juri

 \ /
  Last update: 2019-02-19 15:58    [W:0.063 / U:6.064 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site