lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Feb]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [LKP] efad4e475c [ 40.308255] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
On Mon 18-02-19 17:11:49, Rong Chen wrote:
>
> On 2/18/19 5:03 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 18-02-19 16:47:26, Rong Chen wrote:
> > > On 2/18/19 3:08 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Mon 18-02-19 13:28:23, kernel test robot wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > > [ 40.305212] PGD 0 P4D 0
> > > > > [ 40.308255] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
> > > > > [ 40.313055] CPU: 1 PID: 239 Comm: udevd Not tainted 5.0.0-rc4-00149-gefad4e4 #1
> > > > > [ 40.321348] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1 04/01/2014
> > > > > [ 40.330813] RIP: 0010:page_mapping+0x12/0x80
> > > > > [ 40.335709] Code: 5d c3 48 89 df e8 0e ad 02 00 85 c0 75 da 89 e8 5b 5d c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 53 48 89 fb 48 8b 43 08 48 8d 50 ff a8 01 48 0f 45 da <48> 8b 53 08 48 8d 42 ff 83 e2 01 48 0f 44 c3 48 83 38 ff 74 2f 48
> > > > > [ 40.356704] RSP: 0018:ffff88801fa87cd8 EFLAGS: 00010202
> > > > > [ 40.362714] RAX: ffffffffffffffff RBX: fffffffffffffffe RCX: 000000000000000a
> > > > > [ 40.370798] RDX: fffffffffffffffe RSI: ffffffff820b9a20 RDI: ffff88801e5c0000
> > > > > [ 40.378830] RBP: 6db6db6db6db6db7 R08: ffff88801e8bb000 R09: 0000000001b64d13
> > > > > [ 40.386902] R10: ffff88801fa87cf8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff88801e640000
> > > > > [ 40.395033] R13: ffffffff820b9a20 R14: ffff88801f145258 R15: 0000000000000001
> > > > > [ 40.403138] FS: 00007fb2079817c0(0000) GS:ffff88801dd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> > > > > [ 40.412243] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > > > > [ 40.418846] CR2: 0000000000000006 CR3: 000000001fa82000 CR4: 00000000000006a0
> > > > > [ 40.426951] Call Trace:
> > > > > [ 40.429843] __dump_page+0x14/0x2c0
> > > > > [ 40.433947] is_mem_section_removable+0x24c/0x2c0
> > > > This looks like we are stumbling over an unitialized struct page again.
> > > > Something this patch should prevent from. Could you try to apply [1]
> > > > which will make __dump_page more robust so that we do not blow up there
> > > > and give some more details in return.
> > >
> > > Hi Hocko,
> > >
> > > I have applied [1] and attached the dmesg file.
> > Thanks so the log confirms that this is really an unitialized struct
> > page
> > [ 12.228622] raw: ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff
> > [ 12.231474] page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PagePoisoned(p))
> > [ 12.232135] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > [ 12.232649] kernel BUG at include/linux/mm.h:1020!
> >
> > So now, we have to find out what has been left behind. Please see my
> > other email. Also could you give me faddr2line of the
> > is_mem_section_removable offset please? I assume it is
> > is_pageblock_removable_nolock:
> > if (!node_online(page_to_nid(page)))
> > return false;
>
>
> faddr2line result:
>
> is_mem_section_removable+0x24c/0x2c0:
> page_to_nid at include/linux/mm.h:1020
> (inlined by) is_pageblock_removable_nolock at mm/memory_hotplug.c:1221
> (inlined by) is_mem_section_removable at mm/memory_hotplug.c:1241

Thanks so this indeed points to page_to_nid. Thanks!
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-02-18 10:29    [W:0.059 / U:0.756 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site