Messages in this thread | | | From | Erwan Velu <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Reporting reasons why driver prematurely exit | Date | Wed, 13 Feb 2019 12:19:58 +0000 |
| |
Le 13/02/2019 à 11:34, Rafael J. Wysocki a écrit : > So a single "no PCCH" message for this whole function should be sufficient.
Let's do that.
[...] > And what did turn out to be the problem? > > Anyway, pr_info() should be sufficient IMO.
You should be pretty aware of 95d6c0857e54b788982746071130d822a795026b ;)
Depending if we have or not this patch, intel_pstate engage itself or not.
When engaged, we have to perform some configuration that the other state doesn't imply.
I'm updating the patch this way than send a v6.
I just let intel_pstate_msrs_not_valid() in pr_warn() as this one is not supposed to be a "normal" case.
Thanks for your time & reviews.
> Many thanks for your contribution!
My pleasure !
Erwan,
| |