lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Feb]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 2/2] locking/rwsem: Optimize down_read_trylock()
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 02:24:04PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 02:31:26PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
> > Modify __down_read_trylock() to make it generate slightly better code
> > (smaller and maybe a tiny bit faster).
> >
> > Before this patch, down_read_trylock:
> >
> > 0x0000000000000000 <+0>: callq 0x5 <down_read_trylock+5>
> > 0x0000000000000005 <+5>: jmp 0x18 <down_read_trylock+24>
> > 0x0000000000000007 <+7>: lea 0x1(%rdx),%rcx
> > 0x000000000000000b <+11>: mov %rdx,%rax
> > 0x000000000000000e <+14>: lock cmpxchg %rcx,(%rdi)
> > 0x0000000000000013 <+19>: cmp %rax,%rdx
> > 0x0000000000000016 <+22>: je 0x23 <down_read_trylock+35>
> > 0x0000000000000018 <+24>: mov (%rdi),%rdx
> > 0x000000000000001b <+27>: test %rdx,%rdx
> > 0x000000000000001e <+30>: jns 0x7 <down_read_trylock+7>
> > 0x0000000000000020 <+32>: xor %eax,%eax
> > 0x0000000000000022 <+34>: retq
> > 0x0000000000000023 <+35>: mov %gs:0x0,%rax
> > 0x000000000000002c <+44>: or $0x3,%rax
> > 0x0000000000000030 <+48>: mov %rax,0x20(%rdi)
> > 0x0000000000000034 <+52>: mov $0x1,%eax
> > 0x0000000000000039 <+57>: retq
> >
> > After patch, down_read_trylock:
> >
> > 0x0000000000000000 <+0>: callq 0x5 <down_read_trylock+5>
> > 0x0000000000000005 <+5>: mov (%rdi),%rax
> > 0x0000000000000008 <+8>: test %rax,%rax
> > 0x000000000000000b <+11>: js 0x2f <down_read_trylock+47>
> > 0x000000000000000d <+13>: lea 0x1(%rax),%rdx
> > 0x0000000000000011 <+17>: lock cmpxchg %rdx,(%rdi)
> > 0x0000000000000016 <+22>: jne 0x8 <down_read_trylock+8>
> > 0x0000000000000018 <+24>: mov %gs:0x0,%rax
> > 0x0000000000000021 <+33>: or $0x3,%rax
> > 0x0000000000000025 <+37>: mov %rax,0x20(%rdi)
> > 0x0000000000000029 <+41>: mov $0x1,%eax
> > 0x000000000000002e <+46>: retq
> > 0x000000000000002f <+47>: xor %eax,%eax
> > 0x0000000000000031 <+49>: retq
> >
> > By using a rwsem microbenchmark, the down_read_trylock() rate on a
> > x86-64 system before and after the patch were:
> >
> > Before Patch After Patch
> > # of Threads rlock rlock
> > ------------ ----- -----
> > 1 27,787 28,259
> > 2 8,359 9,234
>
> From 1/2:
>
> 1 29,201 30,143 29,458 28,615 30,172 29,201
> 2 6,807 13,299 1,171 7,725 15,025 1,804

Argh, fat fingered and send before I was done typing.

What I wanted to say was; those rlock numbers don't match up. What
gives?

The before _this_ patch number of 27k787 should be the same as the after
first patch number of 30k172.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-02-12 14:26    [W:0.051 / U:1.096 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site