[lkml]   [2019]   [Feb]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] mm/mincore: provide mapped status when cached status is not allowed
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019, Michal Hocko wrote:

> I would go with patch 1 for 5.1. Patches 2 still sounds controversial or
> incomplete to me.

Is it because of the disagreement what 'non-blocking' really means, or do
you see something else missing?

Merging patch just patch 1 withouth patch 2 is probably sort of useless
excercise, unfortunately.


Jiri Kosina

 \ /
  Last update: 2019-02-12 14:10    [W:0.113 / U:3.884 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site