[lkml]   [2019]   [Feb]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4.20 282/352] fs/proc/base.c: use ns_capable instead of capable for timerslack_ns
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 07:02:06PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <> writes:
> > 4.20-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
> > know.
> No objection. But I think of this as a feature addition rather than a
> fix for something. As a feature that we now allow something we
> previously did not does this qualify for a backport to stable?
> It is probably no more harmful in this instance than adding PCI IDs to a
> driver. So I am not worried. I am curious the current guidelines
> are.
> In most cases a small relaxation of permissions like this requires a lot
> of bug fixing as typically code protected by capable(CAP_XXX) has been
> written and tested assuming a trusted root user. Those bug fixes are
> many times too large for a stable backport.

Fair enough, patch is now dropped, thanks for the review.

greg k-h

 \ /
  Last update: 2019-02-12 09:49    [W:0.180 / U:15.184 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site