[lkml]   [2019]   [Feb]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] perf, bpf: Retain kernel executable code in memory to aid Intel PT tracing
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 09:54:01AM +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Which is not really a real use-case.
> > perf analysis with PT becomes inaccurate and main goal
> > of retaining accurate instruction info is not achieved.
> For the majority of real use-cases, yes it is.

In our fleet not a single server is using Intel PT, yet you're
proposing to penalize all of them with shrinker-based JIT freeing?
There is no negotiation here.

 \ /
  Last update: 2019-02-11 09:19    [W:0.068 / U:4.036 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site