lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Feb]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 3/4] uaccess: Check no rescheduling function is called in unsafe region
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 02:45:27PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > index a674c7db..b1bb7e9 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -3289,6 +3289,14 @@ static inline void schedule_debug(struct task_struct *prev)
> > __schedule_bug(prev);
> > preempt_count_set(PREEMPT_DISABLED);
> > }
> > +
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_UACCESS_SLEEP) &&
> > + unlikely(unsafe_user_region_active())) {
> > + printk(KERN_ERR "BUG: scheduling while user_access enabled: %s/%d/0x%08x\n",
> > + prev->comm, prev->pid, preempt_count());
> > + dump_stack();
> > + }
> > +
> > rcu_sleep_check();
> >
> > profile_hit(SCHED_PROFILING, __builtin_return_address(0));
> > @@ -6151,6 +6159,20 @@ void ___might_sleep(const char *file, int line, int preempt_offset)
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(___might_sleep);
> > #endif
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_UACCESS_SLEEP
> > +void __might_resched(const char *file, int line)
> > +{
> > + if (!unsafe_user_region_active())
> > + return;
>
> Could you please more clearly explain why you want/need an exception from
> the __might_resched() debug warning?

In specific; how is the addition in schedule_debug() not triggering on
PREEMPT=y kernels?

If code is preemptible, you can (get) schedule(d). If it is not
preemptible; you do not need these additional tests.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-02-11 14:52    [W:0.167 / U:3.936 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site