lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Feb]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 3/5] i2c:ocores: add polling interface
Date
On Monday, February 11, 2019 2:35:15 PM CET Peter Rosin wrote:
> >>> @@ -294,7 +427,7 @@ static int ocores_init(struct device *dev, struct
> >>> ocores_i2c *i2c)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> /* Init the device */
> >>> oc_setreg(i2c, OCI2C_CMD, OCI2C_CMD_IACK);
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> - oc_setreg(i2c, OCI2C_CONTROL, ctrl | OCI2C_CTRL_IEN | OCI2C_CTRL_EN);
> >>> + oc_setreg(i2c, OCI2C_CONTROL, ctrl | OCI2C_CTRL_EN);
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> You fix this up in patch 5 (in what is perhaps carelessly marketed as
> >> fixes for minor checkpatch issues), but for this patch you are actually
> >> no longer making sure that you clear the OCI2C_CTRL_IEN bit as the code
> >> used to before this patch. I think you intended to preserve that
> >> behavior, no?
> >
> >
> > I think you got confused by the two patches because those lines look very
> >
> > similar.
> >
> > In PATCH 5 what you see is the "style fix" to clear EN and IEN before
> > clock
configuration
> >
> > in PATCH 3 (this one) what you see is when later (same function, after
> > clock
configuration) the device is re-enabled (EN), but without
> > enabling the interrupt because on polling configuration we do not want to
> > see interrupt flowing.
> >
> > So, the behavior is preserved for what concern clearing the IEN bit before
> >
clock configuration.
> >
> > am I wrong?
>
>
> No, I don't think I'm confused and I think you are wrong. Current code does
> this:
>
> u8 ctrl = oc_getreg(i2c, OCI2C_CONTROL);
>
> /* make sure the device is disabled */
> oc_setreg(i2c, OCI2C_CONTROL, ctrl & ~(OCI2C_CTRL_IEN|OCI2C_CTRL_EN));
> ...
> oc_setreg(i2c, OCI2C_CONTROL, ctrl | OCI2C_CTRL_IEN | OCI2C_CTRL_EN));
>
> Here, the final oc_setreg always sets OCI2C_CTRL_IEN.
>
> Patch 3 changes it to:
>
> u8 ctrl = oc_getreg(i2c, OCI2C_CONTROL);
>
> /* make sure the device is disabled */
> oc_setreg(i2c, OCI2C_CONTROL, ctrl & ~(OCI2C_CTRL_IEN|OCI2C_CTRL_EN));
> ...
> oc_setreg(i2c, OCI2C_CONTROL, ctrl | OCI2C_CTRL_EN));
>
> Here, the final oc_setreg restores OCI2C_CTRL_IEN to whatever it was
> at function entry.
>
>
> And patch 5 changes it again to:
>
> u8 ctrl = oc_getreg(i2c, OCI2C_CONTROL);
>
> /* make sure the device is disabled */
> ctrl &= ~(OCI2C_CTRL_IEN | OCI2C_CTRL_EN);
> oc_setreg(i2c, OCI2C_CONTROL, ctrl);
> ...
> oc_setreg(i2c, OCI2C_CONTROL, ctrl | OCI2C_CTRL_EN));
>
> Here, the final oc_setreg keeps OCI2C_CTRL_IEN cleared. I think you wanted
> this deterministic behavior for patch 3 as well.

Now I see what you mean and I agree. I will move the fix from PATCH 5 to PATCH
3, so that bit IEN is clearly cleared.


thanks

>
> Cheers,
> Peter




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-02-11 14:47    [W:0.052 / U:23.496 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site