Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 11 Feb 2019 11:13:38 +0530 | From | Viresh Kumar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] drivers: Frequency constraint infrastructure |
| |
On 08-02-19, 11:35, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > At least some of the underlying mechanics seem to be very similar. > You have priority lists, addition and removal of requests etc. > > Arguably, PM QoS may be regarded as a bit overly complicated, but > maybe they both can use a common library underneath?
> As I said I like the idea of replacing cpufreq notifiers with > something nicer, so if you can avoid doing almost-the-same-ting in two > different frameworks, it would be fine by me.
Ok, will try to move to PM QoS. Thanks.
-- viresh
| |