lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Dec]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1, 1/2] drm/mediatek: Fixup external display black screen issue
From
Date
Hi, Yongqiang:

On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 15:43 +0800, Yongqiang Niu wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 13:48 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
> > Hi, Yongqiang:
> >
> > On Wed, 2019-11-27 at 09:17 +0800, yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com wrote:
> > > From: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
> > >
> > > Problem:
> > > overlay hangup when external display hotplut test
> > >
> > > Fix:
> > > disable overlay when crtc disable
> >
> > I think you do two things in this patch. The first is to config layer
> > before component start, and the second is disable layer when crtc
> > disable. So separate to two patches.
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c
> > > index 4fb346c..7eca02f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c
> > > @@ -369,6 +369,20 @@ static int mtk_crtc_ddp_hw_init(struct mtk_drm_crtc *mtk_crtc)
> > > mtk_disp_mutex_add_comp(mtk_crtc->mutex, mtk_crtc->ddp_comp[i]->id);
> > > mtk_disp_mutex_enable(mtk_crtc->mutex);
> > >
> > > + /* Initially configure all planes */
> > > + for (i = 0; i < mtk_crtc->layer_nr; i++) {
> > > + struct drm_plane *plane = &mtk_crtc->planes[i];
> > > + struct mtk_plane_state *plane_state;
> > > + struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp;
> > > + unsigned int local_layer;
> > > +
> > > + plane_state = to_mtk_plane_state(plane->state);
> > > + comp = mtk_drm_ddp_comp_for_plane(crtc, plane, &local_layer);
> > > + if (comp)
> > > + mtk_ddp_comp_layer_config(comp, local_layer,
> > > + plane_state, NULL);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > for (i = 0; i < mtk_crtc->ddp_comp_nr; i++) {
> > > struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp = mtk_crtc->ddp_comp[i];
> > > enum mtk_ddp_comp_id prev;
> > > @@ -385,20 +399,6 @@ static int mtk_crtc_ddp_hw_init(struct mtk_drm_crtc *mtk_crtc)
> > > mtk_ddp_comp_start(comp);
> > > }
> > >
> > > - /* Initially configure all planes */
> > > - for (i = 0; i < mtk_crtc->layer_nr; i++) {
> > > - struct drm_plane *plane = &mtk_crtc->planes[i];
> > > - struct mtk_plane_state *plane_state;
> > > - struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp;
> > > - unsigned int local_layer;
> > > -
> > > - plane_state = to_mtk_plane_state(plane->state);
> > > - comp = mtk_drm_ddp_comp_for_plane(crtc, plane, &local_layer);
> > > - if (comp)
> > > - mtk_ddp_comp_layer_config(comp, local_layer,
> > > - plane_state, NULL);
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > return 0;
> > >
> > > err_mutex_unprepare:
> > > @@ -607,10 +607,21 @@ static void mtk_drm_crtc_atomic_disable(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> > > for (i = 0; i < mtk_crtc->layer_nr; i++) {
> > > struct drm_plane *plane = &mtk_crtc->planes[i];
> > > struct mtk_plane_state *plane_state;
> > > + struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp = mtk_crtc->ddp_comp[0];
> > > + unsigned int comp_layer_nr = mtk_ddp_comp_layer_nr(comp);
> > > + unsigned int local_layer;
> > >
> > > plane_state = to_mtk_plane_state(plane->state);
> > > plane_state->pending.enable = false;
> > > plane_state->pending.config = true;
> > > +
> > > + if (i >= comp_layer_nr) {
> > > + comp = mtk_crtc->ddp_comp[1];
> > > + local_layer = i - comp_layer_nr;
> > > + } else
> > > + local_layer = i;
> > > + mtk_ddp_comp_layer_config(comp, local_layer,
> > > + plane_state, NULL);
> >
> > I'm confused with this part. The design of this loop is to set
> > plane_state->pending.enable = false and wait for irq handler to write
> > register. Why do you directly write register?
> >
> > Regards,
> > CK
>
> when cmdq enable, mtk_crtc->cmdq_client will be always true when crtc
> create, there is no chance for mtk_crtc_ddp_config process in ddp irq
> callback function

I think this is a bug of patch [1] which has not been upstream yet. So
this part should be moved to that patch.

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11270637/

> >
> > > }
> > > mtk_crtc->pending_planes = true;
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-12-03 09:27    [W:0.035 / U:32.180 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site