lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 4.19 00/93] 4.19.81-stable review
    On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 04:43:17PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
    > On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 21:18 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
    > > On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 07:59:32PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
    > [...]
    > > > I'm confused. You said "by Tue ... 08:27:02 PM UTC". That 8 PM is 20h,
    > > > but did the release on 10h GMT+1, or 9h UTC -- 9 AM.... so like 11
    > > > hours early, if I got the timezones right.
    > > >
    > > > Does PM mean something else in the above context?
    > >
    > > Ugh, no, you are right, I was ignoring the PM thing, I thought the -u
    > > option to date would give me a 24 hour date string, and so I thought
    > > that was 8:27 in the morning.
    > >
    > > Let me mess around with 'date' to see if I can come up with a better
    > > string to use here. I guess:
    > > date --rfc-3339=seconds -u
    > > would probably be best?
    >
    > The --rfc-822 option should give you something close to the current
    > format, but with 24-hour numbering.

    Ah, missed that. I'll go use that.

    Also, I just remembered that if you look in the email headers, there's a
    "X-KernelTest-Deadline:" field that uses the --iso-8601=minutes format.
    I think kernelci uses that to parse for when it needs to finish things
    by, but I don't know if that actually happens or not.

    I'll go fix the string up for the next round.

    thanks,

    greg k-h

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2019-11-09 16:55    [W:2.270 / U:0.092 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site