lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Nov]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/8] ipmi: kill off 'timespec' usage again
On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 09:34:27PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 'struct timespec' is getting removed from the kernel. The usage in ipmi
> was fixed before in commit 48862ea2ce86 ("ipmi: Update timespec usage
> to timespec64"), but unfortunately it crept back in.
>
> The busy looping code can better use ktime_t anyway, so use that
> there to simplify the implementation.

Thanks, this is a big improvement. I have this queued, but if you
are going to submit this, I can remove it, and:

Reviewed-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>

Do you think this should go in to 5.4?

-corey

>
> Fixes: cbb19cb1eef0 ("ipmi_si: Convert timespec64 to timespec")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c | 40 +++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
> index 6b9a0593d2eb..c7cc8538b84a 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
> @@ -265,10 +265,10 @@ static void cleanup_ipmi_si(void);
> #ifdef DEBUG_TIMING
> void debug_timestamp(char *msg)
> {
> - struct timespec t;
> + struct timespec64 t;
>
> - ktime_get_ts(&t);
> - pr_debug("**%s: %ld.%9.9ld\n", msg, (long) t.tv_sec, t.tv_nsec);
> + ktime_get_ts64(&t);
> + pr_debug("**%s: %lld.%9.9ld\n", msg, t.tv_sec, t.tv_nsec);
> }
> #else
> #define debug_timestamp(x)
> @@ -935,38 +935,25 @@ static void set_run_to_completion(void *send_info, bool i_run_to_completion)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Use -1 in the nsec value of the busy waiting timespec to tell that
> - * we are spinning in kipmid looking for something and not delaying
> - * between checks
> + * Use -1 as a special constant to tell that we are spinning in kipmid
> + * looking for something and not delaying between checks
> */
> -static inline void ipmi_si_set_not_busy(struct timespec *ts)
> -{
> - ts->tv_nsec = -1;
> -}
> -static inline int ipmi_si_is_busy(struct timespec *ts)
> -{
> - return ts->tv_nsec != -1;
> -}
> -
> +#define IPMI_TIME_NOT_BUSY ns_to_ktime(-1ull)
> static inline bool ipmi_thread_busy_wait(enum si_sm_result smi_result,
> const struct smi_info *smi_info,
> - struct timespec *busy_until)
> + ktime_t *busy_until)
> {
> unsigned int max_busy_us = 0;
>
> if (smi_info->si_num < num_max_busy_us)
> max_busy_us = kipmid_max_busy_us[smi_info->si_num];
> if (max_busy_us == 0 || smi_result != SI_SM_CALL_WITH_DELAY)
> - ipmi_si_set_not_busy(busy_until);
> - else if (!ipmi_si_is_busy(busy_until)) {
> - ktime_get_ts(busy_until);
> - timespec_add_ns(busy_until, max_busy_us * NSEC_PER_USEC);
> + *busy_until = IPMI_TIME_NOT_BUSY;
> + else if (*busy_until == IPMI_TIME_NOT_BUSY) {
> + *busy_until = ktime_get() + max_busy_us * NSEC_PER_USEC;
> } else {
> - struct timespec now;
> -
> - ktime_get_ts(&now);
> - if (unlikely(timespec_compare(&now, busy_until) > 0)) {
> - ipmi_si_set_not_busy(busy_until);
> + if (unlikely(ktime_get() > *busy_until)) {
> + *busy_until = IPMI_TIME_NOT_BUSY;
> return false;
> }
> }
> @@ -988,9 +975,8 @@ static int ipmi_thread(void *data)
> struct smi_info *smi_info = data;
> unsigned long flags;
> enum si_sm_result smi_result;
> - struct timespec busy_until = { 0, 0 };
> + ktime_t busy_until = IPMI_TIME_NOT_BUSY;
>
> - ipmi_si_set_not_busy(&busy_until);
> set_user_nice(current, MAX_NICE);
> while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
> int busy_wait;
> --
> 2.20.0
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-11-08 23:13    [W:0.100 / U:5.200 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site