lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Nov]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] HID: Improve Windows Precision Touchpad detection.
I've submitted a test containing the Surface Book 2 descriptor.

https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/libevdev/hid-tools/merge_requests/59

Blaž

On Thu, 7 Nov 2019, at 17:48, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> Hi Blaž,
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 12:03 PM Blaž Hrastnik <blaz@mxxn.io> wrote:
> >
> > Per Microsoft spec, usage 0xC5 (page 0xFF) returns a blob containing
> > data used to verify the touchpad as a Windows Precision Touchpad.
> >
> > 0x85, REPORTID_PTPHQA, // REPORT_ID (PTPHQA)
> > 0x09, 0xC5, // USAGE (Vendor Usage 0xC5)
> > 0x15, 0x00, // LOGICAL_MINIMUM (0)
> > 0x26, 0xff, 0x00, // LOGICAL_MAXIMUM (0xff)
> > 0x75, 0x08, // REPORT_SIZE (8)
> > 0x96, 0x00, 0x01, // REPORT_COUNT (0x100 (256))
> > 0xb1, 0x02, // FEATURE (Data,Var,Abs)
> >
> > However, some devices, namely Microsoft's Surface line of products
> > instead implement a "segmented device certification report" (usage 0xC6)
> > which returns the same report, but in smaller chunks.
> >
> > 0x06, 0x00, 0xff, // USAGE_PAGE (Vendor Defined)
> > 0x85, REPORTID_PTPHQA, // REPORT_ID (PTPHQA)
> > 0x09, 0xC6, // USAGE (Vendor usage for segment #)
> > 0x25, 0x08, // LOGICAL_MAXIMUM (8)
> > 0x75, 0x08, // REPORT_SIZE (8)
> > 0x95, 0x01, // REPORT_COUNT (1)
> > 0xb1, 0x02, // FEATURE (Data,Var,Abs)
> > 0x09, 0xC7, // USAGE (Vendor Usage)
> > 0x26, 0xff, 0x00, // LOGICAL_MAXIMUM (0xff)
> > 0x95, 0x20, // REPORT_COUNT (32)
> > 0xb1, 0x02, // FEATURE (Data,Var,Abs)
> >
> > By expanding Win8 touchpad detection to also look for the segmented
> > report, all Surface touchpads are now properly recognized by
> > hid-multitouch.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Blaž Hrastnik <blaz@mxxn.io>
> > ---
>
> This looks good to me.
> We *could* shorten the ifs and make only one conditional, but I find
> it this way more readable and future proof.
>
> There is just one last step required before we merge this: add a
> regression test so we ensure we do not break it in the future.
>
> It should be merely a matter of sending a MR to
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/libevdev/hid-tools.
> It should consist in adding the report descriptor in the same way we
> have
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/libevdev/hid-tools/blob/master/tests/test_multitouch.py#L1656-1658.
> Then, make sure an unpatched kernel breaks the multitouch test (sudo
> pytest-3 -k 'multitouch and TestPTP') and that a patched kernel is
> fixed.
>
> Cheers,
> Benjamin
>
> > drivers/hid/hid-core.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> > index 63fdbf09b044..2af597cd5d65 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> > @@ -742,6 +742,10 @@ static void hid_scan_feature_usage(struct hid_parser *parser, u32 usage)
> > if (usage == 0xff0000c5 && parser->global.report_count == 256 &&
> > parser->global.report_size == 8)
> > parser->scan_flags |= HID_SCAN_FLAG_MT_WIN_8;
> > +
> > + if (usage == 0xff0000c6 && parser->global.report_count == 1 &&
> > + parser->global.report_size == 8)
> > + parser->scan_flags |= HID_SCAN_FLAG_MT_WIN_8;
> > }
> >
> > static void hid_scan_collection(struct hid_parser *parser, unsigned type)
> > --
> > 2.23.0
> >
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-11-07 10:08    [W:0.119 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site