[lkml]   [2019]   [Nov]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Coreboot vs Libreboot - GNU: Please use Coreboot without the blobs (compile time option). - Why the [edits]?
The man is no[w] a eunich is what I ment to type. I did type it later in 
the post. My definition is the anti-american definition.

Men are men. Women are women. Women who cannot have children are broken
women. Men with their genitals sawn off (with proof posted to their own
website) are Euniches.

(And you shouldn't marry ANY of them: only marry young virgin girls.)

Remember: RMS was "cancled" for TEXT he posted to /his own/ website, and
people here felt it "on topic" to demand his removal.

On 2019-11-06 22:32, Alexandre François Garreau wrote:
> Le mercredi 6 novembre 2019 22:49:07 CET, vous avez écrit :
>> The man is no a
>> eunich, but he is not a woman (since he cannot have children).
> So you go under M. Garisson definition of a women, according which
> sterile
> cissexual (that is non-transsexual) “women” are actually “men”, and any
> man
> dating whoever is not able to get pregnant is being gay?
> Does that also apply to hormonal contraception? Does it mean a woman
> taking
> the pill is a man? Damn, trans men must be happy of this consideration
> x)
> At least it’s easy to become a man through surgery, according your
> definitions.
> Sooooooo did you check all women you had sex with are fertile? there
> are
> common affections that make women sterile. Maybe you have been having
> gay sex
> without knowing it.
>> A woman
>> without a womb
> Actually if you looked well at the photos, she has one. That’s the
> goal of
> sex reassignment surgery.
>> is like a broken compiler: it's not a compiler: just the
>> pieces that could have been one. Same with a man without genitals.
> If you believe the only purpose of a human is to give birth, “make love
> not
> war” and stop bothering people on mailing lists. But afaik, according
> your
> definitions… you can’t (give birth).
> But wait… you were defending pedophilia… but a prepubere girl can’t get
> pregnant… so… what’s the point of it?
> I mean, having sex with a prepubere girl and with a transsexual woman
> is
> biologically just the same: it can’t give birth.
>> In america it is lauded when men have their genitals chopped off.
> No, many americans are transphobic too. And most of them are neither
> supporters of transgender rights, nor transphobes, but don’t care.
> Like
> everywhere actually.
>> But when a man might hint at the wish to marry adorable young girls:
>> america wants to kill and torture him.
> Sadly, yet you’re doing nothing to help but more harm, because nobody
> allies
> with your views and you’re not trying to understand a fuck.
>> The old religions
> I’m pretty much sure the old religions, especially some popular
> branches of
> Islam and Christianism condemn what you say about women.
>> And the libreboot maintainer is a Eunich, NOT a woman - a he or a
>> neuter.
> An eunuch is a man without genitals. But she has (female) genitals,
> female
> levels of hormone, looks like a woman, and by the virtue of “if it’s
> all like
> a duck, it’s a duck” she’s a woman. period. you just draw essentialism
> for the
> rest.
>> I doubt [she]'ll ever contribute anything much more after having [her]
>> balls
>> sliced off of his body. They usually lose the will.
> Loss of testosterone imply indeed small depression and loss of will.
> That’s
> why in sex reassignment we gives hormone including testosterone and
> female
> sexual hormones, so the will come back ;) and without the depression
> coming
> with gender dysphoria.
> I think she works on other stuff. LibreBoot is worked on by other
> people now.

 \ /
  Last update: 2019-11-07 00:59    [W:0.041 / U:7.040 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site