Messages in this thread | | | From | Sven Eckelmann <> | Subject | Re: WARNING in mark_lock (3) | Date | Thu, 28 Nov 2019 10:03:13 +0100 |
| |
On Thursday, 28 November 2019 09:54:15 CET Dmitry Vyukov wrote: [...] > > I was thinking more about rerunning the same bisect but tell it to assume > > "crashed: general protection fault in batadv_iv_ogm_queue_add" as OK instead > > of assuming that it is a crashed like the previous "crashed: WARNING in > > mark_lock". Just to get a non-bogus bisect result. Or try to rerun the > > bisect between 40e220b4218b and 89d57dddd7d319ded00415790a0bb3c954b7e386 > > But... but this done by a program. What do you mean by "tell it"?
Sorry that I asked about what the infrastructure around syzbot can do and how the interaction with it looks like.
Kind regards, Sven[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |