Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Kefeng Wang <> | Subject | [PATCH 1/4] workqueue: Use pr_warn instead of pr_warning | Date | Thu, 28 Nov 2019 08:47:49 +0800 |
| |
Use pr_warn() instead of the remaining pr_warning() calls.
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> --- kernel/workqueue.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index bc88fd939f4e..cfc923558e04 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -4374,8 +4374,8 @@ void destroy_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq) for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) { spin_lock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock); if (WARN_ON(pwq_busy(pwq))) { - pr_warning("%s: %s has the following busy pwq\n", - __func__, wq->name); + pr_warn("%s: %s has the following busy pwq\n", + __func__, wq->name); show_pwq(pwq); spin_unlock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock); mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex); -- 2.20.1
| |