Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] scheduler changes for v5.5 | From | Valentin Schneider <> | Date | Mon, 25 Nov 2019 16:20:21 +0000 |
| |
On 25/11/2019 15:08, Ingo Molnar wrote: > We can give testers a linearized tree for testing, should this come up > (which I doubt it will ...), ok? >
My worry (and I think Mel's) is on performance bisection of the mainline tree (not specifically on the load balancer rework), by LKP or else. It's not something I personally do (nor expect to do in the foreseeable future), so Mel is much better positioned than I to argue for/against this.
Still, I was under the impression that not introducing (scheduler) regressions in the git history was valuable. If I'm misguided, feel free to ignore.
> Thanks, > > Ingo >
| |