lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Nov]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] net: dsa: ocelot: fix "should it be static?" warnings
Date
Fix following sparse warnings:
drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c:351:6: warning: symbol 'felix_txtstamp' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Chen Wandun <chenwandun@huawei.com>
---
drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c b/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c
index 167e415..b7f9246 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c
@@ -348,8 +348,8 @@ static bool felix_rxtstamp(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
return false;
}

-bool felix_txtstamp(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
- struct sk_buff *clone, unsigned int type)
+static bool felix_txtstamp(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
+ struct sk_buff *clone, unsigned int type)
{
struct ocelot *ocelot = ds->priv;
struct ocelot_port *ocelot_port = ocelot->ports[port];
--
2.7.4
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-11-22 13:26    [W:0.043 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site