Messages in this thread | | | From | Atish Patra <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Add support for SBI v0.2 | Date | Thu, 21 Nov 2019 19:07:20 +0000 |
| |
On Tue, 2019-11-19 at 23:51 -0800, Paul Walmsley wrote: > Hi Atish, > > On Mon, 18 Nov 2019, Atish Patra wrote: > > > The Supervisor Binary Interface(SBI) specification[1] now defines a > > base extension that provides extendability to add future extensions > > while maintaining backward compatibility with previous versions. > > The new version is defined as 0.2 and older version is marked as > > 0.1. > > > > This series adds support v0.2 and a unified calling convention > > implementation between 0.1 and 0.2. It also adds minimal SBI > > functions > > from 0.2 as well to keep the series lean. > > > > [1] > > https://github.com/riscv/riscv-sbi-doc/blob/master/riscv-sbi.adoc > > > > The base support for SBI v0.2 is already available in OpenSBI v0.5. > > This series needs following additional patches in OpenSBI. > > > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/opensbi/2019-November/000704.html > > > > Tested on both BBL, OpenSBI with/without the above patch series. > > Just based on a quick look: > > All of the patches in this series add warnings reported by > 'scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict'. Could you please fix and repost? >
Yeah sure. I will do that.
> Also: could you rebase these patches on top of the current RISC-V > for-next > branch? There are some significant conflicts after Christoph's > nommu > work. >
ok. I will rebase on top of for-next.
> We'll wait to send these upstream until the SBI v0.2 spec is frozen, > but > in the meantime, it'll be good to get these into the experimental > branch. > > thanks, > > - Paul
-- Regards, Atish
| |