Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] net: ipmr: fix suspicious RCU warning | From | Eric Dumazet <> | Date | Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:41:08 -0800 |
| |
On 11/21/19 2:17 AM, Anders Roxell wrote: > On Thu, 21 Nov 2019 at 08:15, Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org> wrote: >> >> On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 at 18:45, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 11/20/19 7:22 AM, Anders Roxell wrote: > > [snippet] > >>>> + rtnl_lock(); >>>> err = ipmr_rules_init(net); >>>> + rtnl_unlock(); >>>> if (err < 0) >>>> goto ipmr_rules_fail; >>> >>> Hmmm... this might have performance impact for creation of a new netns >>> >>> Since the 'struct net' is not yet fully initialized (thus published/visible), >>> should we really have to grab RTNL (again) only to silence a warning ? >>> >>> What about the following alternative ? >> >> I tried what you suggested, unfortunately, I still got the warning. > > I was wrong, so if I also add "lockdep_rtnl_is_held()" to the > "ipmr_for_each_table()" macro it works. > >> >> >> [ 43.253850][ T1] ============================= >> [ 43.255473][ T1] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage >> [ 43.259068][ T1] >> 5.4.0-rc8-next-20191120-00003-g3aa7c2a8649e-dirty #6 Not tainted >> [ 43.263078][ T1] ----------------------------- >> [ 43.265134][ T1] net/ipv4/ipmr.c:1759 RCU-list traversed in >> non-reader section!! >> [ 43.267587][ T1] >> [ 43.267587][ T1] other info that might help us debug this: >> [ 43.267587][ T1] >> [ 43.271129][ T1] >> [ 43.271129][ T1] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 >> [ 43.274021][ T1] 2 locks held by swapper/0/1: >> [ 43.275532][ T1] #0: ffff000065abeaa0 (&dev->mutex){....}, at: >> __device_driver_lock+0xa0/0xb0 >> [ 43.278930][ T1] #1: ffffa000153017f0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}, at: >> rtnl_lock+0x1c/0x28 >> [ 43.282023][ T1] >> [ 43.282023][ T1] stack backtrace: >> [ 43.283921][ T1] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted >> 5.4.0-rc8-next-20191120-00003-g3aa7c2a8649e-dirty #6 >> [ 43.287152][ T1] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) >> [ 43.288920][ T1] Call trace: >> [ 43.290057][ T1] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x2d0 >> [ 43.291535][ T1] show_stack+0x20/0x30 >> [ 43.292967][ T1] dump_stack+0x204/0x2ac >> [ 43.294423][ T1] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xf4/0x108 >> [ 43.296163][ T1] ipmr_device_event+0x100/0x1e8 >> [ 43.297812][ T1] notifier_call_chain+0x100/0x1a8 >> [ 43.299486][ T1] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x38/0x48 >> [ 43.301248][ T1] call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x128/0x148 >> [ 43.303158][ T1] rollback_registered_many+0x684/0xb48 >> [ 43.304963][ T1] rollback_registered+0xd8/0x150 >> [ 43.306595][ T1] unregister_netdevice_queue+0x194/0x1b8 >> [ 43.308406][ T1] unregister_netdev+0x24/0x38 >> [ 43.310012][ T1] virtnet_remove+0x44/0x78 >> [ 43.311519][ T1] virtio_dev_remove+0x5c/0xc0 >> [ 43.313114][ T1] really_probe+0x508/0x920 >> [ 43.314635][ T1] driver_probe_device+0x164/0x230 >> [ 43.316337][ T1] device_driver_attach+0x8c/0xc0 >> [ 43.318024][ T1] __driver_attach+0x1e0/0x1f8 >> [ 43.319584][ T1] bus_for_each_dev+0xf0/0x188 >> [ 43.321169][ T1] driver_attach+0x34/0x40 >> [ 43.322645][ T1] bus_add_driver+0x204/0x3c8 >> [ 43.324202][ T1] driver_register+0x160/0x1f8 >> [ 43.325788][ T1] register_virtio_driver+0x7c/0x88 >> [ 43.327480][ T1] virtio_net_driver_init+0xa8/0xf4 >> [ 43.329196][ T1] do_one_initcall+0x4c0/0xad8 >> [ 43.330767][ T1] kernel_init_freeable+0x3e0/0x500 >> [ 43.332444][ T1] kernel_init+0x14/0x1f0 >> [ 43.333901][ T1] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 >> >> >> Cheers, >> Anders >> >>> >>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/ipmr.c b/net/ipv4/ipmr.c >>> index 6e68def66822f47fc08d94eddd32a4bd4f9fdfb0..b6dcdce08f1d82c83756a319623e24ae0174092c 100644 >>> --- a/net/ipv4/ipmr.c >>> +++ b/net/ipv4/ipmr.c >>> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(mfc_unres_lock); >>> >>> static struct kmem_cache *mrt_cachep __ro_after_init; >>> >>> -static struct mr_table *ipmr_new_table(struct net *net, u32 id); >>> +static struct mr_table *ipmr_new_table(struct net *net, u32 id, bool init); >>> static void ipmr_free_table(struct mr_table *mrt); >>> > > static void ip_mr_forward(struct net *net, struct mr_table *mrt, > @@ -110,7 +110,8 @@ static void ipmr_expire_process(struct timer_list *t); > > #ifdef CONFIG_IP_MROUTE_MULTIPLE_TABLES > #define ipmr_for_each_table(mrt, net) \ > - list_for_each_entry_rcu(mrt, &net->ipv4.mr_tables, list) > + list_for_each_entry_rcu(mrt, &net->ipv4.mr_tables, list, \ > + lockdep_rtnl_is_held()) > static struct mr_table *ipmr_mr_table_iter(struct net *net, > struct mr_table *mrt) > > > Cheers, > Anders
That is great, I guess we can submit the two patches in a series.
| |