lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Nov]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC net-next] net: WireGuard secure network tunnel
Date
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> writes:

>> > + MAX_QUEUED_INCOMING_HANDSHAKES = 4096, /* TODO: replace this with DQL */
>> > + MAX_STAGED_PACKETS = 128,
>> > + MAX_QUEUED_PACKETS = 1024 /* TODO: replace this with DQL */
>>
>> Yes, please (on the TODO) :)
>>
>> FWIW, since you're using pointer rings I think the way to do this is
>> probably to just keep the limits in place as a maximum size, and then
>> use DQL (or CoDel) to throttle enqueue to those pointer rings instead of
>> just letting them fill.
>>
>> Happy to work with you on this (as I believe I've already promised), but
>> we might as well do that after the initial version is merged...
>
> I've actually implemented this a few times, but DQL always seems too
> slow to react properly, and I haven't yet been able to figure out
> what's happening. Let's indeed work on this after the initial version
> is merged. I think this change, and several more like it, will be the
> topic of some interesting discussions. But that doesn't need to happen
> /now/ I don't think.

Agreed. Let's wait until the initial version is merged and use that as a
base to benchmark against... :)

-Toke

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-11-21 13:01    [W:0.061 / U:0.664 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site