Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 20 Nov 2019 22:53:39 +0100 | | From | Borislav Petkov <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC 01/14] x86/asm: add iosubmit_cmds512() based on movdir64b CPU instruction |
| |
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 02:23:49PM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote: > +/** > + * iosubmit_cmds512 - copy data to single MMIO location, in 512-bit units
Where is the alignment check on that data before doing the copying?
> + * @dst: destination, in MMIO space (must be 512-bit aligned) > + * @src: source > + * @count: number of 512 bits quantities to submit
Where's that check on the data?
> + * > + * Submit data from kernel space to MMIO space, in units of 512 bits at a > + * time. Order of access is not guaranteed, nor is a memory barrier > + * performed afterwards. > + */ > +static inline void iosubmit_cmds512(void __iomem *dst, const void *src, > + size_t count)
An iosubmit function which returns void and doesn't tell its callers whether it succeeded or not? That looks non-optimal to say the least.
Why isn't there a fallback function which to call when the CPU doesn't support movdir64b?
Because then you can use alternative_call() and have the thing work regardless of hardware support for MOVDIR*.
> +{ > + const u8 *from = src; > + const u8 *end = from + count * 64; > + > + if (!cpu_has_write512())
If anything, that thing needs to go and you should use
static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MOVDIR64B)
as it looks to me like you would care about speed on this fast path? Yes, no?
-- Regards/Gruss, Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
|  |