Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 15 Nov 2019 15:22:21 +0000 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] spi: dt-bindings: spi-controller: add wakeup-source and interrupts |
| |
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 07:52:22AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> if: > properties: > interrupt-names: > contains: > const: wakeup > required: > - interrupt-names > then: > required: > - wakeup-source
That seems to say that if we have a device that has an interrupt called "wakeup" then it must be a wakeup source. Is that desirable? Being able to wake the system is partly a property of the system as a whole (the wakeup signal needs to be wired somewhere where it can wake things) and a device might have a signal that could be used to wake the system, may even be called "wakeup" by the device but for some reason isn't wired suitably in a given system. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |