lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Nov]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] spi: dt-bindings: spi-controller: add wakeup-source and interrupts
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 07:52:22AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:

> if:
> properties:
> interrupt-names:
> contains:
> const: wakeup
> required:
> - interrupt-names
> then:
> required:
> - wakeup-source

That seems to say that if we have a device that has an interrupt called
"wakeup" then it must be a wakeup source. Is that desirable? Being
able to wake the system is partly a property of the system as a whole
(the wakeup signal needs to be wired somewhere where it can wake things)
and a device might have a signal that could be used to wake the system,
may even be called "wakeup" by the device but for some reason isn't
wired suitably in a given system.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-11-15 16:23    [W:0.053 / U:0.896 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site