lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Nov]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] lib: optimize cpumask_local_spread()
On Fri 15-11-19 17:09:13, Shaokun Zhang wrote:
[...]
> Oh, my mistake, for the previous instance, I don't list all IRQs and
> just choose one IRQ from one NUMA node. You can see that the IRQ
> number is not consistent :-).
> IRQ from 345 to 368 will be bound to CPU cores which are in NUMA node2
> and each IRQ is corresponding to one core.
>

This is quite confusing then. I would suggest providing all IRQ used for
the device with the specific node affinity to see the difference in the
setup.

--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-11-15 14:37    [W:0.724 / U:0.640 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site