lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Oct]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: thermal: Add generic power domain warming device binding
From
Date
Hi Rob,
Thanks for the review

On 09/30/2019 10:42 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 01:14:34PM -0400, Thara Gopinath wrote:
>> Add binding to define power domains as thermal warming
>> devices.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> .../bindings/thermal/pwr-domain-warming.txt | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/pwr-domain-warming.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/pwr-domain-warming.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/pwr-domain-warming.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..25fc568
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/pwr-domain-warming.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
>> +* Generic power domain based thermal warming device.
>> +
>> +This binding describes the power domains that can be used as a
>> +thermal warming device.
>
> This looks like just a gathering of properties and way to instantiate
> some driver.
>
> I think this all belongs in the power domain provider. Make it a cooling
> device and you should know which domains are relevant based on the
> compatible (though perhaps we could consider a list in DT). If you want
> to instantiate a separate driver to handle this, then make the power
> domain driver do that.

This sounds fine. A list in DT might be needed though. I have a separate
driver. I should be able to get the genpd provider driver call
into it. I had asked this to Ulf and he seemed to be fine with it as well


>
> Rob
>
>

--
Regards
Thara

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-10-09 14:19    [W:0.045 / U:10.976 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site