lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Oct]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 3/6] x86/alternatives,jump_label: Provide better text_poke() batching interface
From
Date
On 07/10/2019 10:17, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Adding another text_poke_bp_batch() user made me realize the interface
> is all sorts of wrong. The text poke vector should be internal to the
> implementation.
>
> This then results in a trivial interface:
>
> text_poke_queue() - which has the 'normal' text_poke_bp() interface
> text_poke_finish() - which takes no arguments and flushes any
> pending text_poke()s.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>

Thanks!
-- Daniel

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-10-09 14:04    [W:0.159 / U:12.168 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site