Messages in this thread | | | From | Hans de Goede <> | Subject | [RFC v2 0/1] s390/purgatory: Make sure we fail the build if purgatory has missing symbols | Date | Tue, 8 Oct 2019 10:54:20 +0200 |
| |
Hi s390 maintainers,
Here is a second RFC version of my patch for $subject, mirroring the changes in v2 of the x86 patch.
As last time this patch is completely UNTESTED.
Changes in v2: - Using 2 if_changed lines under a single rule does not work, then 1 of the 2 will always execute each build. Instead add a new (unused) purgatory.chk intermediate which gets linked from purgatory.ro without -r to do the missing symbols check - This also fixes the check generating an a.out file (oops)
Relevant part of the cover letter from v1:
In 5.4-rc1 the 2 different sha256 implementations for the purgatory resp. for crypto/sha256_generic.c have been consolidated into 1 single shared implementation under lib/crypto/sha256.c .
At least on x86 this was causing silent corruption of the purgatory due to a missing memzero_explicit symbol in the purgatory string.c/.o file.
With the x86 equivalent of this patch applied a x86 build of 5.4-rc1 now correctly fails:
CHK arch/x86/purgatory/purgatory.ro ld: arch/x86/purgatory/purgatory.ro: in function `sha256_transform': sha256.c:(.text+0x1c0c): undefined reference to `memzero_explicit' make[2]: *** [arch/x86/purgatory/Makefile:72: arch/x86/purgatory/kexec-purgatory.c] Error 1 make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:509: arch/x86/purgatory] Error 2 make: *** [Makefile:1650: arch/x86] Error 2
It would be great if the s390 maintainers can test this equivalent patch on s390.
As for fixing the missing memzero_explicit symbol, we are currently discussing making memzero_explicit a static inline wrapper of memset in string.h, so that we do not need to implement it in multiple places.
This discussion is Cc-ed to the generic linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org list, it is happening in the "[PATCH v2 5.4 regression fix] x86/boot: Provide memzero_explicit" thread.
Regards,
Hans
| |