lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Oct]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 4.4 49/99] md: dont call spare_active in md_reap_sync_thread if all member devices cant work
Date
From: Guoqing Jiang <jgq516@gmail.com>

[ Upstream commit 0d8ed0e9bf9643f27f4816dca61081784dedb38d ]

When add one disk to array, the md_reap_sync_thread is responsible
to activate the spare and set In_sync flag for the new member in
spare_active().

But if raid1 has one member disk A, and disk B is added to the array.
Then we offline A before all the datas are synchronized from A to B,
obviously B doesn't have the latest data as A, but B is still marked
with In_sync flag.

So let's not call spare_active under the condition, otherwise B is
still showed with 'U' state which is not correct.

Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com>
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/md/md.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index 067af77bb729a..d1b09657c1939 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -8445,7 +8445,8 @@ void md_reap_sync_thread(struct mddev *mddev)
/* resync has finished, collect result */
md_unregister_thread(&mddev->sync_thread);
if (!test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_INTR, &mddev->recovery) &&
- !test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_REQUESTED, &mddev->recovery)) {
+ !test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_REQUESTED, &mddev->recovery) &&
+ mddev->degraded != mddev->raid_disks) {
/* success...*/
/* activate any spares */
if (mddev->pers->spare_active(mddev)) {
--
2.20.1


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-10-03 18:00    [W:0.229 / U:2.184 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site