Messages in this thread | | | From | Qiang Zhao <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH 0/7] towards QE support on ARM | Date | Wed, 23 Oct 2019 02:52:15 +0000 |
| |
On 22/10/2019 18:18, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> > Sent: 2019年10月22日 18:18 > To: Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@nxp.com>; Leo Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com> > Cc: Timur Tabi <timur@kernel.org>; Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > linux-serial@vger.kernel.org; Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>; > linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] towards QE support on ARM > > On 22/10/2019 04.24, Qiang Zhao wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2019 at 6:11 AM Leo Li wrote > > >> Right. I'm really interested in getting this applied to my tree and > >> make it upstream. Zhao Qiang, can you help to review Rasmus's > >> patches and comment? > > > > As you know, I maintained a similar patchset removing PPC, and someone > told me qe_ic should moved into drivers/irqchip/. > > I also thought qe_ic is a interrupt control driver, should be moved into dir > irqchip. > > Yes, and I also plan to do that at some point. However, that's orthogonal to > making the driver build on ARM, so I don't want to mix the two. Making it > usable on ARM is my/our priority currently. > > I'd appreciate your input on my patches.
Yes, we can put this patchset in first place, ensure it can build and work on ARM, then push another patchset to move qe_ic.
Best Regards, Qiang
| |