lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3] x86/alternatives,jump_label: Provide better text_poke() batching interface
From
Date
Hi Peter,

On 27/08/2019 20:06, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Adding another text_poke_bp_batch() user made me realize the interface
> is all sorts of wrong. The text poke vector should be internal to the
> implementation.
>
> This then results in a trivial interface:
>
> text_poke_queue() - which has the 'normal' text_poke_bp() interface
> text_poke_finish() - which takes no arguments and flushes any
> pending text_poke()s.

I liked the changes. My only concern is about the internal vector. I thought
about making it internal in the past, but I chose to make it "per use-case"
because there might cases in which more entries would be needed, without the
restriction of using static memory. This might be the ftrace case...

[ more in the next email ].

-- Daniel

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-10-02 18:34    [W:0.127 / U:19.960 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site