Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 2 Oct 2019 08:31:23 -0700 | From | Jerry Snitselaar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/3] tpm: Fix TPM 1.2 Shutdown sequence to prevent future TPM operations |
| |
On Wed Oct 02 19, Sasha Levin wrote: >On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 03:57:58PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: >>On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 04:14:44PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: >>>From: Vadim Sukhomlinov <sukhomlinov@google.com> >>> >>>commit db4d8cb9c9f2af71c4d087817160d866ed572cc9 upstream >>> >>>TPM 2.0 Shutdown involve sending TPM2_Shutdown to TPM chip and disabling >>>future TPM operations. TPM 1.2 behavior was different, future TPM >>>operations weren't disabled, causing rare issues. This patch ensures >>>that future TPM operations are disabled. >>> >>>Fixes: d1bd4a792d39 ("tpm: Issue a TPM2_Shutdown for TPM2 devices.") >>>Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org >>>Signed-off-by: Vadim Sukhomlinov <sukhomlinov@google.com> >>>[dianders: resolved merge conflicts with mainline] >>>Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> >>>Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> >>>Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> >>>--- >>> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 5 +++-- >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >>What kernel version(s) is this for? > >It would go to 4.19, we've recently reverted an incorrect backport of >this patch. > >Jarkko, why is this patch 3/3? We haven't seen the first two on the >mailing list, do we need anything besides this patch? > >-- >Thanks, >Sasha
It looks like there was a problem mailing the earlier patchset, and patches 1 and 2 weren't cc'd to stable, but patch 3 was.
| |