lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] tpm: Fix TPM 1.2 Shutdown sequence to prevent future TPM operations
On Wed Oct 02 19, Sasha Levin wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 03:57:58PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
>>On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 04:14:44PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>>>From: Vadim Sukhomlinov <sukhomlinov@google.com>
>>>
>>>commit db4d8cb9c9f2af71c4d087817160d866ed572cc9 upstream
>>>
>>>TPM 2.0 Shutdown involve sending TPM2_Shutdown to TPM chip and disabling
>>>future TPM operations. TPM 1.2 behavior was different, future TPM
>>>operations weren't disabled, causing rare issues. This patch ensures
>>>that future TPM operations are disabled.
>>>
>>>Fixes: d1bd4a792d39 ("tpm: Issue a TPM2_Shutdown for TPM2 devices.")
>>>Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>>>Signed-off-by: Vadim Sukhomlinov <sukhomlinov@google.com>
>>>[dianders: resolved merge conflicts with mainline]
>>>Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
>>>Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
>>>Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
>>>---
>>> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 5 +++--
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>>What kernel version(s) is this for?
>
>It would go to 4.19, we've recently reverted an incorrect backport of
>this patch.
>
>Jarkko, why is this patch 3/3? We haven't seen the first two on the
>mailing list, do we need anything besides this patch?
>
>--
>Thanks,
>Sasha

It looks like there was a problem mailing the earlier patchset, and patches 1 and 2
weren't cc'd to stable, but patch 3 was.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-10-02 17:31    [W:0.072 / U:30.452 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site