lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/uncore: fix integer overflow on shift of a u32 integer
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 12:55:45PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> Shifting the u32 integer result of (pci_dword & SNR_IMC_MMIO_BASE_MASK)
> will end up with an overflow when pci_dword greater than 0x1ff. Fix this
> by casting pci_dword to a resource_size_t before masking and shifting it.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unintentional integer overflow")

I don't see that tag in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst ;)

IIUC this is unintented truncation of the upper bits due to missing type
promotion before the shift, rather than overflow (i.e. the value
wrapping across addition/subtraction), so I think the wording is
slightly misleading.

Does coverity call that integer overflow?

It might be better to say:

| [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/uncore: don't truncate upper bits of address
|
| Shifting the u32 integer result of (pci_dword & SNR_IMC_MMIO_BASE_MASK)
| by 23 will throw away the upper 23 bits of the potentially 64-bit
| address. Fix this by casting pci_dword to a resource_size_t before
| masking and shifting it.
|
| Found by coverity ("Unintentional integer overflow").

Otherwise, the patch looks fine to me:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Thanks,
Mark.

> Fixes: ee49532b38dd ("perf/x86/intel/uncore: Add IMC uncore support for Snow Ridge")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> index b10a5ec79e48..ed69df1340d9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> @@ -4415,7 +4415,7 @@ static void snr_uncore_mmio_init_box(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
> return;
>
> pci_read_config_dword(pdev, SNR_IMC_MMIO_BASE_OFFSET, &pci_dword);
> - addr = (pci_dword & SNR_IMC_MMIO_BASE_MASK) << 23;
> + addr = ((resource_size_t)pci_dword & SNR_IMC_MMIO_BASE_MASK) << 23;
>
> pci_read_config_dword(pdev, SNR_IMC_MMIO_MEM0_OFFSET, &pci_dword);
> addr |= (pci_dword & SNR_IMC_MMIO_MEM0_MASK) << 12;
> --
> 2.20.1
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-10-02 14:25    [W:0.049 / U:9.528 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site