lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Ack to merge through DRM? WAS Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mm: Add write-protect and clean utilities for address space ranges
From
Date
On 9/26/19 10:16 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 1:09 PM Thomas Hellström (VMware)
> <thomas_os@shipmail.org> wrote:
>> That said, if people are OK with me modifying the assert in
>> pud_trans_huge_lock() and make __walk_page_range non-static, it should
>> probably be possible to make it work, yes.
> I don't think you need to modify that assert at all.
>
> That thing only exists when there's a "pud_entry" op in the walker,
> and then you absolutely need to have that mmap_lock.
>
> As far as I can tell, you fundamentally only ever work on a pte level
> in your address space walker already and actually have a WARN_ON() on
> the pud_huge thing, so no pud entry can possibly apply.
>
> So no, the assert in pud_trans_huge_lock() does not seem to be a
> reason not to just use the existing page table walkers.
>
> And once you get rid of the walking, what is left? Just the "iterate
> over the inode mappings" part. Which could just be done in
> mm/pagewalk.c, and then you don't even need to remove the static.
>
> So making it be just another walking in pagewalk.c would seem to be
> the simplest model.
>
> Call it "walk_page_mapping()". And talk extensively about how the
> locking differs a lot from the usual "walk_page_vma()" things.
>
> The then actual "apply" functions (what a horrid name) could be in the
> users. They shouldn't be mixed in with the walking functions anyway.
> They are callbacks, not walkers.
>
> Linus

Linus, Kirill

I've pushed a reworked version based on the pagewalk code here:

https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~thomash/linux/log/?h=pagewalk

(top three patched)

with users included here:

https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~thomash/linux/log/?h=coherent-rebased

Do you think this could work? The reason that the "mm: Add write-protect
and clean.." code is still in mm as a set of helpers, is of course that
much of the needed functionality is not exported, presumably since we
want to keep page table manipulation in mm.

Thanks,

Thomas


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-10-02 11:22    [W:0.117 / U:37.124 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site