lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/8] workqueue: Convert for_each_wq to use built-in list check
Date
From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>

Because list_for_each_entry_rcu() can now check for holding a
lock as well as for being in an RCU read-side critical section,
this commit replaces the workqueue_sysfs_unregister() function's
use of assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex() and list_for_each_entry_rcu() with
list_for_each_entry_rcu() augmented with a lockdep_is_held() optional
argument.

Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 10 ++--------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index bc2e09a..e501c79 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -364,11 +364,6 @@ static void workqueue_sysfs_unregister(struct workqueue_struct *wq);
!lockdep_is_held(&wq_pool_mutex), \
"RCU or wq_pool_mutex should be held")

-#define assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex(wq) \
- RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held() && \
- !lockdep_is_held(&wq->mutex), \
- "RCU or wq->mutex should be held")
-
#define assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex_or_pool_mutex(wq) \
RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held() && \
!lockdep_is_held(&wq->mutex) && \
@@ -425,9 +420,8 @@ static void workqueue_sysfs_unregister(struct workqueue_struct *wq);
* ignored.
*/
#define for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) \
- list_for_each_entry_rcu((pwq), &(wq)->pwqs, pwqs_node) \
- if (({ assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex(wq); false; })) { } \
- else
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu((pwq), &(wq)->pwqs, pwqs_node, \
+ lockdep_is_held(&(wq->mutex)))

#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_WORK

--
2.9.5
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-10-03 03:33    [W:0.059 / U:22.972 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site