lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Oct]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] hugetlb: Add nohugepages parameter to prevent hugepages creation
From
Date
On 10/11/19 3:39 PM, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> Currently there are 2 ways for setting HugeTLB hugepages in kernel; either
> users pass parameters on kernel command-line or they can write to sysfs
> files (which is effectively the sysctl way).
>
> Kdump kernels won't benefit from hugepages - in fact it's quite opposite,
> it may be the case hugepages on kdump kernel can lead to OOM if kernel
> gets unable to allocate demanded pages due to the fact the preallocated
> hugepages are consuming a lot of memory.
>
> This patch proposes a new kernel parameter to prevent the creation of
> HugeTLB hugepages - we currently don't have a way to do that. We can
> even have kdump scripts removing the kernel command-line options to
> set hugepages, but it's not straightforward to prevent sysctl/sysfs
> configuration, given it happens in later boot or anytime when the
> system is running.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@canonical.com>
> ---
>
> About some decisions took in this patch:
>
> * early_param() was used because I couldn't find a way to enforce
> parameters' ordering when using __setup(), and we need nohugepages
> processed before all other hugepages options.

I don't know much about early_param(), so I will assume this works as you
describe. However, a quick grep shows hugepage options for ia64 also with
early_param.

> * The return when sysctl handler is prevented to progress due to
> nohugepages is -EINVAL, but could be changed; I've just followed
> present code there, but I'm OK changing that if we have suggestions.

It looks like you only have short circuited/prevented nr_hugepages via
sysfs/sysctl. Theoretically, one could set nr_overcommit_hugepages and
still allocate hugetlb pages. So, if you REALLY want to shut things down
you need to stop this as well.

There is already a macro hugepages_supported() that can be set by arch
specific code. I wonder how difficult it would be to 'overwrite' the
macro if nohugepages is specified. Perhaps just a level of naming
indirection. This would use the existing code to prevent all hugetlb usage.

It seems like there may be some discussion about 'the right' way to
do kdump. I can't add to that discussion, but if such an option as
nohugepages is needed, I can help.
--
Mike Kravetz

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-10-14 20:26    [W:0.327 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site